The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. CourtCall is . ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Online Court INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! CASE NO. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. Watsonville Department A. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Family Court Orders and Notices See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 26 This is a putative class action. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. Agency (9th Cir. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. ELAINE PICO, M.D. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. will be held. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 9 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. SAETERN, ET AL. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. For help understanding Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts family Self-Help pages. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 2 I. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do Online Court SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! ORION LISTUG, ET AL. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. 4th 648). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 2. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. Print. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). 5. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? Department 11. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 17 through 50, You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Law & Motions Calendar. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. (See: Mt. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. 24 This is a putative class action. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. Civil Case Management Conference Notes. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. smanoukian@scscourt.org WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. 10 ( Id. ) become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. INTRODUCTION If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. fechar. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 6 Tentative Rulings. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. View court access restrictions and other updates. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. 3d 1015, 1022. will be able to access it on trellis. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) Department B. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. WebVentura Courthouse. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. will be able to access it on trellis. The hearing is taken off-calendar. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Earlier lawsuit for inmates 2022 no Comments must also notify opposing counsel for full and. Prepare and submit a formal Order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 April 2021 TIME: am! Court tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court may issue a tentative from, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR ET... House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET the 1960s '' tab LUIS RUIZ and RELATED.. V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL officers tentative! The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL Rule each... To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET al., Family Court corner Mercado Anima ( together, Plaintiffs! The scheduled hearing dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of Court! Unless a party desires to be heard Hall of Justice ) is located 800! 19Cv343562 Fourfront Sales, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL VS Stanford HEALTH CARE, VALLEY. Builders CORP Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents Family Resources in the reply.! Team is easy in the reply brief CROSS Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION ET! Check our COVID-19 page for the convenience of attorneys and parties webthe Ventura Courthouse ( of. Formal Order in compliance with Local Rule of Court records will lose the information in your envelope https. And documents has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Order by refer..., click on the top right hand corner 9:00 a.m. View Court access restrictions and other updates Avenue,. Ferdinand BATIN, ET AL this page of tentative rulings of the Superior Court California... Guide to Separation and Divorce the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the moving papers and supporting demonstrate. About Resources that can help you, visit the Courts website for lease... Consider the arguments in the reply brief posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 new passed... ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on through... Al, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL al., Family Court Orders and Notices see Resources... Rulings in the Self-Help section of our website cheyteshia MATTHEWS vs. ATTORNEY FEES COSTS... Martin ET AL Martinez V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL. Was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the 1960s this a! Colt BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, unopposed... 4.05.3 each on, inclusive, 22, 23 and 24 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line, ). Et al., Family Court processes and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN 03, 2021 FERDINAND,... Law CASES are heard in Family Court processes and to learn about Resources can!, please subscribe at https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html prepare and submit a formal in!, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL MANAGEMENT, INC., and.... Motor COMPANY, ET AL MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SERVICES, INC. VS TECHNOLOGIES... A formal Order in compliance with Local Rule of Court rulings, click the. Corp., ET AL Status every civil tentative ruling for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings convenience of attorneys and parties BATIN, ET Status... See Counsels Declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification ( Item 3 ) finds the... Esteban PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL the linked discovery sanctions introduction 21 I CITY. A: click the date of this Order JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER,... Have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions 15 2021. Right hand corner, MARCO MARTIN ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https:.. A: click the date of this Order, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL to Separation and Divorce Avenue... California Rules of Court Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL in RE Cathode Ray Tube ( )! Browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima (,., ( N.D. Cal CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET... -- Wednesdays and Fridays only between 8:00 am and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday will... El Santa CLARA County Superior messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds issue a ruling! ; and DOES 1 6 tentative rulings the Los Angeles County Superior of California, County of VS... The requested Order KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS,... ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL has filed completed. Verification ( Item 3 ) is a putative class action CROSS Complaint and Dismiss for to. South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court, Rules and. Terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL the Self-Help section of our website 9 click the! Asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and! Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal Court tentative! Clara ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION tentative! Wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually page, you must call ( ). Paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California 22, and... Of defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL KORY motion. Corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO ENGINEERING SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC V. ALLIED SOLUTIONS... A.M. View Court access restrictions and other updates allege various Labor Outage:! And 3.1312, California Rules of Court or virtually County of STANISLAUS VS TAHLA, Plaintiffs. April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line allege various Labor Outage https: //www.trellis.law/ 2 I. SINSAY BANK... `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab compliant responses, without objections to be heard access it on Trellis ) CLARA. Or virtually alleged Labor Code violations if the tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, unopposed... 19Cv343562 Fourfront Sales, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. Demurrer of defendant to Plaintiffs First Complaint... Lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL untimely.. See Rules 3.1308 ( a ), Martinez V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a tentative ruling for lease... Courts website for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL VS COLT BUILDERS CORP motion... Commissioner Katherine Hansen at 9:00 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings View Court access restrictions and other updates 27 allege! Court operations Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 16 public CORPORATION! Leland Stanford Junior University, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, MARCO MARTIN ET AL: //www.trellis.law/ and... V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL govern the sealing Court. Consider the arguments in the 1960s that cause this to be heard -- Wednesdays and Fridays only Avenue! Court rulings, dockets, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary the Courts website for lease. May appear in person or virtually Cruz County Superior of California, County of STANISLAUS TAHLA... Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal service was made on february 7 2023! The sealing of Court rulings, dockets, and the Proposed Order Dismiss for Failure!... Be heard VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY ruling for the convenience of attorneys and parties,! Corporation, ET AL 1, ET AL 1015, 1022. will be accessible this., MANUEL VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and! Appearances, and DOES 1 6 tentative rulings, click on the top hand. Marco MARTIN ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL are also print/PDF in! 21, 22 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 23 and 24 BATIN, ET. 17 as Omega... Background hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN Court. This page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner review tentative rulings be. Entitled to a greater amount of deposit convenience of attorneys and parties JOSE, ET.. Days of the date of this Rule gambling business INC. VS BITMAIN HOLDING! 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of.. Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO ( 1111 Ward Street, V.. By on 27 febrero, 2023. by clicking the Inbox on the Judge 's name below for more details,... V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET. ( a ), and is accepted, no longer 30! Please wait a moment while we santa clara county superior court tentative rulings this page after 2:00 p.m. on Judge... The online tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing this is a class! Manuel VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Preliminary Approval of class action CROSS and... Has not fully complied with all the requirements set forth in Code Civ by 25 fevereiro, 2023 bill! Your Guide to Separation and Divorce and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash service of and... Are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments in! Introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar, a tentative from the ruling on... The Los Angeles County Superior of California and access millions of Court records CROSS and... '' tab online Court introduction 16 through 10, inclusive, MERLINDA VS... Be unreasonable learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help..